* David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Plus, the way you're doing it now is violating the locking > > > protocol used by that driver. > > > > Yep, you are right, but that is the easy issue to fix. > > Which is why I was puzzled that you didn't start out doing it the > "right" way ... even just hard-wiring the dubious assumption that > "rtc0" is the right RTC to use. :) because this was mostly about an quick & easy hack to see whether it makes sense at all to automate the testing of suspend/resume. (People who want to use RTC functionality might not have the desire to get into extending it straight away - they just want something rather obvious done and that's it.) Ingo _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
