On Saturday 02 February 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > Yep, you are right, but that is the easy issue to fix. > > > > Which is why I was puzzled that you didn't start out doing it the > > "right" way ... even just hard-wiring the dubious assumption that > > "rtc0" is the right RTC to use. :) > > because this was mostly about an quick & easy hack to see whether it > makes sense at all to automate the testing of suspend/resume. I think you should have written "quick and dirty". ;) It would have been easier to just use the public interface and hard-wire "rtc0". But going directly to the hardware was dirtier, and more in the spirit of "hack that obviously shouldn't go upstream until it gets done properly". - Dave _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
