On Tuesday 22 January 2008 00:36:45 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > I still don't like this function wrapping. > > I'm pretty sure the additional parameter to the function is not > > needed. We can check dev->suspend_in_progress to find out > > if we are in a up/down or in a suspend/resume cycle. > > You're right, I overlooked that. [snip] The patch looks good. Did you try it on b43 hardware? -- Greetings Michael. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
