On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 13:15 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > config SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE > depends on ARCH_SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE > > and then the architecture gets to define that when it can suspend. In fact, just doing depends on (ARCH_SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE && !SMP) || (ARCH_SUSPEND_SMP_POSSIBLE && SMP) would probably be good instead of doing the intermediate SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE and SUSPEND_SMP_POSSIBLE. The reason I like this better is that we don't have a central editing point where patches conflict causing unnecessary problems. But both are much better than what we have now anyway :) johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
