Re: [Resend][PATCH] PM: Fix dependencies of CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION (updated)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> +config SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE
> +	bool
> +	depends on (X86 && !X86_VOYAGER) || (PPC32 && PPC_MPC52xx) \
> +		   || (PPC64 && (PPC_PSERIES || PPC_PMAC)) || ARM || BLACKFIN \
> +		   || MIPS || SUPERH || FRV
> +	depends on !SMP
> +	default y

I guess I'd rather left SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE to allways y (as it always
was), and let architectures that can't handle it  not return "mem"
from list of valid states...
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux