Re: Re: [Resend][PATCH] PM: Fix dependencies of CONFIG_SUSPEND and CONFIG_HIBERNATION (updated)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2007-08-06 at 12:26 +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:

> Well, so that it does not bitrot? This is few bytes, I'd say, and I
> believe we have too many config options already.

This is not an option the user is ever going to see. I think I'd prefer
having two new per-ARCH config symbols though:
config SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE
	depends on ARCH_SUSPEND_UP_POSSIBLE

and then the architecture gets to define that when it can suspend.

johannes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux