Re: [RFC/RFT][PATCH -mm 1/4] PM: Introduce set_target method in pm_ops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tuesday 26 June 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:

> Alternatively, I could write that the argument passed to .enter() etc. is
> guaranteed to be the same as the one passed to .set_target(), but I didn't want
> to say that. :-)

Why not?  So long as enter() takes an argument, that seems
to me exactly what it should guarantee.  Although that 
argument should vanish; any platform that differentiates
what it does based on that parameter can just be required
to provide a set_target() method.

- Dave
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm

[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux