On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 22:40 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > + * @set_target: Tell the platform which system sleep state is going to be > + * entered. The information passed to @set_target should be disregarded > + * by the platform as soon as @finish() is executed and if @prepare() > + * fails. > + * This callback is optional. However, if it is implemented, the > + * argument passed to @prepare(), @enter and @finish() must be ignored. I don't understand the point in mandating that then the argument to enter() is to be ignored, why bother? It doesn't look as though we can possibly do anything with the semantics here that would mean the state set by set_target is different to the state passed to enter(), can we? johannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
