On Tue, 22 May 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > Probably Alan is right? Perhaps it is better to rename it to > create_singlethread_freezeable_workqueue(). This way we don't need to audit > the users when we add multithread freezable wqs. > > Also, this name is more consistent wrt > create_workqueue/create_singlethread_workqueue. I already sent in a revised patch and a request to revert the create_singlethread_freezeable_workqueue() macro! Whatever you guys decide, please let Greg and me know as soon as possible. This particular fix is needed before 2.6.22 gets released. Alan Stern _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
