On 05/22, Alan Stern wrote: > > On Tue, 22 May 2007, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > Probably Alan is right? Perhaps it is better to rename it to > > create_singlethread_freezeable_workqueue(). This way we don't need to audit > > the users when we add multithread freezable wqs. > > > > Also, this name is more consistent wrt > > create_workqueue/create_singlethread_workqueue. > > I already sent in a revised patch and a request to revert the > create_singlethread_freezeable_workqueue() macro! > > Whatever you guys decide, please let Greg and me know as soon as > possible. This particular fix is needed before 2.6.22 gets released. Ah, I am sorry for the confusion, I didn't see the start of this thread. Please do what you think right. Oleg. _______________________________________________ linux-pm mailing list linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
