On Tuesday 20 March 2007 3:09 pm, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > +static int at91_pm_valid(suspend_state_t state)
> > > +{
> > > + return state == PM_SUSPEND_MEM;
> > > +}
> > >
> > > static struct pm_ops at91_pm_ops ={
> > > .valid = at91_pm_valid_state,
^^^^^
> > > .prepare = at91_pm_prepare,
> > > .enter = at91_pm_enter,
> > > + .valid = at91_pm_valid,
^^^^^
> > > };
> > >
> > > static int __init at91_pm_init(void)
> >
> > Clearly bogus. The STR support isn't upstream yet, true, but
>
> No... look again.
No, YOU look again. If that compiles, it's a GCC bug.
> This tries to disable suspend-to-disk on ARM, so
> that only suspend-to-RAM is enabled. I'd not call it bogus.
>
> The series is needed to stop pm from reporting "platform" on ARM;
> "platform" only makes sense on ACPI systems.
>
> Pavel
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
