On Tuesday 20 March 2007 3:17 am, Johannes Berg wrote:
> --- linux-2.6.orig/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c 2007-03-20 10:55:35.433214909 +0100
> +++ linux-2.6/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c 2007-03-20 10:56:02.243214909 +0100
> @@ -199,11 +199,16 @@ error:
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static int at91_pm_valid(suspend_state_t state)
> +{
> + return state == PM_SUSPEND_MEM;
> +}
>
> static struct pm_ops at91_pm_ops ={
> .valid = at91_pm_valid_state,
> .prepare = at91_pm_prepare,
> .enter = at91_pm_enter,
> + .valid = at91_pm_valid,
> };
>
> static int __init at91_pm_init(void)
Clearly bogus. The STR support isn't upstream yet, true, but
you shouldn't modify that code at all.
- Dave
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
