Hi!
> > +static int at91_pm_valid(suspend_state_t state)
> > +{
> > + return state == PM_SUSPEND_MEM;
> > +}
> >
> > static struct pm_ops at91_pm_ops ={
> > .valid = at91_pm_valid_state,
> > .prepare = at91_pm_prepare,
> > .enter = at91_pm_enter,
> > + .valid = at91_pm_valid,
> > };
> >
> > static int __init at91_pm_init(void)
>
> Clearly bogus. The STR support isn't upstream yet, true, but
No... look again. This tries to disable suspend-to-disk on ARM, so
that only suspend-to-RAM is enabled. I'd not call it bogus.
The series is needed to stop pm from reporting "platform" on ARM;
"platform" only makes sense on ACPI systems.
Pavel
--
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
_______________________________________________
linux-pm mailing list
linux-pm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.linux-foundation.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-pm
