On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 14:11 +0200, ext Pavel Machek wrote: > On Mon 2006-09-18 15:01:15, Igor Stoppa wrote: > > On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 12:53 +0200, ext Pavel Machek wrote: > > > On Mon 2006-09-18 13:46:04, Amit Kucheria wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 14:34 +0200, ext Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > > (And IIRC zaurus lasts longer on batteries than 770 does... or at > > > > > least comparable. Maybe OMAP is more complex, but is it actually good > > > > > thing?) > > > > > > > > Wifi + Significantly higher resolution display tend to play a 'small' > > > > role in this. > > > > > > 640x480 display vs. 800x480 display does not sound like _that_ big > > > deal to me. You are right with wifi, that beasts eat 1W-or-so. (and it > > > would be great if someone implemented wifi power saving...) > > > > wifi power saving does exist and you have it already in 770 > > and also color depth probably affects performance: do they have the same > > number of bits per pixel? > > Not sure, but I believe it has 65000 colors. > > What wireless chip is included in 770? Are you using devicespace > stack? Is wifi driver opensource? > Pavel It is similar to other 'open-sourced' drivers - binary firmware, open source driver. Anyways... this is getting off-topic. Sharp Zaurus was great hardware, but its not shipped in USA/Europe anymore. And if the only criteria for hardware-that-matters is hackability, then Nokia 770 can be flashed with your own kernel and rootfs. Check www.maemo.org Regards, Amit -- Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria at nokia.com> Nokia
