On Mon 2006-09-18 15:01:15, Igor Stoppa wrote: > On Mon, 2006-09-18 at 12:53 +0200, ext Pavel Machek wrote: > > On Mon 2006-09-18 13:46:04, Amit Kucheria wrote: > > > On Sun, 2006-09-17 at 14:34 +0200, ext Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > (And IIRC zaurus lasts longer on batteries than 770 does... or at > > > > least comparable. Maybe OMAP is more complex, but is it actually good > > > > thing?) > > > > > > Wifi + Significantly higher resolution display tend to play a 'small' > > > role in this. > > > > 640x480 display vs. 800x480 display does not sound like _that_ big > > deal to me. You are right with wifi, that beasts eat 1W-or-so. (and it > > would be great if someone implemented wifi power saving...) > > wifi power saving does exist and you have it already in 770 > and also color depth probably affects performance: do they have the same > number of bits per pixel? Not sure, but I believe it has 65000 colors. What wireless chip is included in 770? Are you using devicespace stack? Is wifi driver opensource? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
