On Mon, Sep 11, 2006 at 01:25:42PM -0700, Matthew Locke wrote: > On Sep 11, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Pavel Machek wrote: > >And IIRC Greg's last question was "what is it good > >for?". > > That was a long time ago and again many people from the embedded > community have provided lots of answers. I'm still not convinced. You can't break the current cpufreq interface, and to claim that it is irrelevant is just ignoring 95% of the Linux market right now :) So, you all better work with the cpufreq people, otherwise this code is going to go nowhere. I'm with Pavel here, in my opinion, he is correct. thanks, greg k-h
