On Tue 2006-09-12 00:24:25, Eugeny S. Mints wrote: > Pavel Machek wrote: > >>>I was talking about kernel<->user interface. > >>me too. PowerOP is inkernel interface but which _allows_ to build various > >>different kernel<->user interfaces on top of it. This PowerOP _advantage_ > >>allows community to experiment with various kernel<->user interfaces > >>on top > > > >Kernel interface is not something to be experimented with. > it is since current interface (cpufreq in conjunction with > /sys/power/state, etc) does not address all requirements to the >interface. Removing kernel interface takes 2+ years. So no, kernel interface is not something to be experimented with, at least not on mainline. > >Actually that's good idea. Submit powerop without doing _any_ kernel > >interface changes, so we can see that it makes sense... > It was submitted this way several times. So try again, and cc lkml this time. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
