On Wednesday 26 July 2006 2:11 pm, Eugeny S. Mints wrote: > Since UI part seems most painful one I can think of additional splitting > of PowerOP sysfs layer into two parts. First would be > powerop_register/unregister_point(), powerop_select_point() and > another one would be UI sysfs part. And the latter would be optional. Well, I think it'd be fair to say that something like /sys/power/state appling to an OP belongs in the core of that framework. Luckily that would be straightforward to implmenent, explain, and understand. - Dave
