On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 06:00:48 -0800 (PST) "Patrick Mochel" <mochel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ah, I see what you're saying. I think it is per-class, but I also think > that it's policy that should exist in Userspace. DPM implements a good model of this already (albeit for voltage and frequency stepping) through the sysfs, which I like, especially for embedded systems, where 'cat' is all that is needed to write a new policy. I also am a fan of consolidating the policy into a single location, rather then spreading out the power controls - this reduces the load and intelligence of a power policy user agent. Looking forward to IRC meetings... :) Jordan -- Jordan Crouse Senior Linux Engineer AMD - Personal Connectivity Solutions Group <www.amd.com/embeddedprocessors>
