On Wed, 9 Mar 2005, Jordan Crouse wrote: > On Wed, 9 Mar 2005 06:00:48 -0800 (PST) > "Patrick Mochel" <mochel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Ah, I see what you're saying. I think it is per-class, but I also think > > that it's policy that should exist in Userspace. > > DPM implements a good model of this already (albeit for voltage and frequency stepping) > through the sysfs, which I like, especially for embedded systems, where 'cat' is all that > is needed to write a new policy. I also am a fan of consolidating the policy into a single > location, rather then spreading out the power controls - this reduces the load and intelligence > of a power policy user agent. What is "DPM"? Pat P.S. BTW, the wraparound setting in your mailer is set too high, warping your messages when viewed w/ an 80-column terminal.
