swsusp & modules [was Re: [linux-pm] [Fwd: Re: PM messages]]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2004-10-28 at 12:57 -0700, Patrick Mochel wrote:

> That's actually another reason why it'd be good to differentiate between
> 'stopping' a device and 'powering it down'. We can temporarily freeze the
> video device, save it's state, then re-enable it to continue writing to
> the screen. Ditto for the swap device.

Well, whatever you do, you don't do it by breaking the transition into
different steps. That won't work.

You enter a state, you always go back to state 0 (resumed) before
entering another one. Period. That's the basis of why I got save_state()
removed in the first place, remember ?

Just read the paper David did summarizing our discussions, I think it's
pretty clear the kind of callbacks we need.

Ben.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ACPI]     [Netdev]     [Ethernet Bridging]     [Linux Wireless]     [CPU Freq]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]

  Powered by Linux