On Thu, 28 Oct 2004, Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > > > static struct pm_ops acpi_pm_ops = {
> > > > .prepare = acpi_pm_prepare,
> > > > .enter = acpi_pm_enter,
> > > > .finish = acpi_pm_finish,
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > I'll drop this one. Please try again when things have calmed down a
> > > > > bit.
> > >
> > > I do not know if things are calm enough now... I forgot about acpi
> > > pieces. Hmm, and about some arm pieces. This should fix it.
> >
> > Sorry, I'm not going to support this until we have consensus about the
> > semantics and the types. It's just a band-aid as-is. Ben said:
> >
> > The patches are easily done, but for once, I want to make sure we all
> > agree on the semantics before coding anything.
>
> This is not an band-aid and everyone agreed this is good thing.
> Look again, it does not change driver model, it just introduces
> type checking into kernel/power.
Fair enough, I apologize for jumping to conclusions and not reading close
enough. It looks fine. Sorry for the late-night rant.
Pat
