Hi!
> > > static struct pm_ops acpi_pm_ops = {
> > > .prepare = acpi_pm_prepare,
> > > .enter = acpi_pm_enter,
> > > .finish = acpi_pm_finish,
> > > };
> > >
> > > I'll drop this one. Please try again when things have calmed down a
> > > > bit.
> >
> > I do not know if things are calm enough now... I forgot about acpi
> > pieces. Hmm, and about some arm pieces. This should fix it.
>
> Sorry, I'm not going to support this until we have consensus about the
> semantics and the types. It's just a band-aid as-is. Ben said:
>
> The patches are easily done, but for once, I want to make sure we all
> agree on the semantics before coding anything.
This is not an band-aid and everyone agreed this is good thing.
Look again, it does not change driver model, it just introduces
type checking into kernel/power.
Ben was talking about driver model.
And as of "big vision", yes I do have one. Modulo details,
it was pretty much agreed on irc as one possible way.
Pavel
--
64 bytes from 195.113.31.123: icmp_seq=28 ttl=51 time=448769.1 ms
