On 28.10.2019 06:41, Vidya Sagar wrote: > On 10/26/2019 3:12 AM, Heiner Kallweit wrote: >> I wonder whether anybody actually wants to disable ASPM support. >> In an old Kconfig commit message is mentioned that it may help >> to reduce kernel size of embedded systems. However I would >> think that on embedded systems ASPM is quite useful as it >> saves significant power and may result in a lower system >> temperature therefore. >> W/o ASPM support we have to live with devices coming up >> in whatever mode boot loader or firmware configure. >> >> Heiner >> > It means that we can still have an option to specify one of > PCIEASPM_DEFAULT/PERFORMANCE/POWERSAVE/POWER_SUPERSAVE configs right? > Yes, these config options would remain. PCIEASPM has a dependency on PCIEPORTBUS, so the idea would be to build ASPM support whenever PCIEPORTBUS is defined. > Vidya Sagar > Heiner
