On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 12:59:26AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Saturday, August 10, 2019 12:01:16 AM CEST Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 05, 2019 at 11:09:19PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 10:52 PM Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > @@ -942,7 +942,7 @@ void pci_update_current_state(struct pci_dev *dev, pci_power_t state) > > > > u16 pmcsr; > > > > > > > > pci_read_config_word(dev, dev->pm_cap + PCI_PM_CTRL, &pmcsr); > > > > - dev->current_state = (pmcsr & PCI_PM_CTRL_STATE_MASK); > > > > + dev->current_state = pci_power_state(pmcsr); > > > > > > The if () branch above should cover the D3cold case, shouldn't it? > > > > You mean the "if (platform_pci_get_power_state(dev) == PCI_D3cold)" > > test? > > Not exactly. > > I mean "if (platform_pci_get_power_state(dev) == PCI_D3cold || > !pci_device_is_present(dev))". I don't see what you mean. The !pci_device_is_present(dev) test tells us something about what the state of the device was at some time in the past, but of course it doesn't say anything about whether reading PCI_PM_CTRL will succeed, e.g., # dev is present and in D0 platform_pci_get_power_state(dev) == PCI_D3cold # currently false !pci_device_is_present(dev) # currently false # dev is surprise hot-removed or put in D3cold pci_read_config_word(PCI_PM_CTRL, &pmcsr) # pmcsr == ~0 (error response) (Maybe going to D3cold is impossible, but it's pretty hard to prove that. The hot-remove is definitely possible.) > > platform_pci_get_power_state() returns PCI_UNKNOWN in some cases. > > When that happens, might we not read PCI_PM_CTRL of a device in > > D3cold? I think this also has the same hotplug question as above. > > Surprise hot-removal can take place at any time, in particular after setting > current_state, so adding extra checks here doesn't prevent the value of > it from becoming stale at least sometimes anyway. Definitely. The point is not to prevent current_state from becoming stale, it's to prevent us from interpreting ~0 data (known to be invalid) as though it were a valid register value. Bjorn