On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 09:13:12AM -0800, Dave Hansen wrote: > On 12/20/18 7:12 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > >> Other than the error we might be able to use acpi_map_pxm_to_online_node > >> for this, or call both acpi_map_pxm_to_node and acpi_map_pxm_to_online_node > >> and compare the answers to verify we are getting the node we want? > > Where are we at with this? It'd be nice to resolve it for v4.21, but > > it's a little out of my comfort zone, so I don't want to apply it > > unless there's clear consensus that this is the right fix. > > I still think the fix in this patch sweeps the problem under the rug too > much. But, it just might be the best single fix for backports, for > instance. Sounds like we should first find the best fix, then worry about how to backport it. So I think we have a little more noodling to do, and I'll defer this for now. Bjorn
