On 12/20/18 7:12 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> Other than the error we might be able to use acpi_map_pxm_to_online_node >> for this, or call both acpi_map_pxm_to_node and acpi_map_pxm_to_online_node >> and compare the answers to verify we are getting the node we want? > Where are we at with this? It'd be nice to resolve it for v4.21, but > it's a little out of my comfort zone, so I don't want to apply it > unless there's clear consensus that this is the right fix. I still think the fix in this patch sweeps the problem under the rug too much. But, it just might be the best single fix for backports, for instance.
