Hi, On Wednesday 04 April 2018 03:50 PM, Gustavo Pimentel wrote: > On 02/04/2018 06:34, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Wednesday 28 March 2018 05:08 PM, Gustavo Pimentel wrote: >>> The PCIe controller dual mode is capable of operating in host mode as well >>> as endpoint mode by configuration, therefore this patch aims to add >>> endpoint mode support to the designware driver. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimentel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> >>> --- >>> drivers/pci/dwc/Kconfig | 45 ++++++-- >>> drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c | 157 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >>> drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c | 5 + >>> 3 files changed, 187 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/Kconfig b/drivers/pci/dwc/Kconfig >>> index 2f3f5c5..3fd7daf 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/Kconfig >>> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/Kconfig >>> @@ -7,8 +7,7 @@ config PCIE_DW >>> >>> config PCIE_DW_HOST >>> bool >>> - depends on PCI >>> - depends on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN >>> + depends on PCI && PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN >>> select PCIE_DW >>> >>> config PCIE_DW_EP >>> @@ -52,16 +51,42 @@ config PCI_DRA7XX_EP >>> >>> config PCIE_DW_PLAT >>> bool "Platform bus based DesignWare PCIe Controller" >>> - depends on PCI >>> - depends on PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN >>> - select PCIE_DW_HOST >>> - ---help--- >>> - This selects the DesignWare PCIe controller support. Select this if >>> - you have a PCIe controller on Platform bus. >>> + help >>> + There are two instances of PCIe controller in Designware IP. >>> + This controller can work either as EP or RC. In order to enable >>> + host-specific features PCIE_DW_PLAT_HOST must be selected and in >>> + order to enable device-specific features PCIE_DW_PLAT_EP must be >>> + selected. >>> >>> - If you have a controller with this interface, say Y or M here. >>> +config PCIE_DW_PLAT_HOST >>> + bool "Platform bus based DesignWare PCIe Controller - Host mode" >>> + depends on PCI && PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN >>> + select PCIE_DW_HOST >>> + select PCIE_DW_PLAT >>> + default y >>> + help >>> + Enables support for the PCIe controller in the Designware IP to >>> + work in host mode. There are two instances of PCIe controller in >>> + Designware IP. >>> + This controller can work either as EP or RC. In order to enable >>> + host-specific features PCIE_DW_PLAT_HOST must be selected and in >>> + order to enable device-specific features PCI_DW_PLAT_EP must be >>> + selected. >>> >>> - If unsure, say N. >>> +config PCIE_DW_PLAT_EP >>> + bool "Platform bus based DesignWare PCIe Controller - Endpoint mode" >>> + depends on PCI && PCI_MSI_IRQ_DOMAIN >>> + depends on PCI_ENDPOINT >>> + select PCIE_DW_EP >>> + select PCIE_DW_PLAT >>> + help >>> + Enables support for the PCIe controller in the Designware IP to >>> + work in endpoint mode. There are two instances of PCIe controller >>> + in Designware IP. >>> + This controller can work either as EP or RC. In order to enable >>> + host-specific features PCIE_DW_PLAT_HOST must be selected and in >>> + order to enable device-specific features PCI_DW_PLAT_EP must be >>> + selected. >>> >>> config PCI_EXYNOS >>> bool "Samsung Exynos PCIe controller" >>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c >>> index 5416aa8..921ab07 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c >>> +++ b/drivers/pci/dwc/pcie-designware-plat.c >>> @@ -12,19 +12,29 @@ >>> #include <linux/interrupt.h> >>> #include <linux/kernel.h> >>> #include <linux/init.h> >>> +#include <linux/of_device.h> >>> #include <linux/of_gpio.h> >>> #include <linux/pci.h> >>> #include <linux/platform_device.h> >>> #include <linux/resource.h> >>> #include <linux/signal.h> >>> #include <linux/types.h> >>> +#include <linux/regmap.h> >>> >>> #include "pcie-designware.h" >>> >>> struct dw_plat_pcie { >>> - struct dw_pcie *pci; >>> + struct dw_pcie *pci; >>> + struct regmap *regmap; >>> + enum dw_pcie_device_mode mode; >>> }; >>> >>> +struct dw_plat_pcie_of_data { >>> + enum dw_pcie_device_mode mode; >>> +}; >>> + >>> +static const struct of_device_id dw_plat_pcie_of_match[]; >>> + >>> static int dw_plat_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp) >>> { >>> struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_pp(pp); >>> @@ -42,9 +52,61 @@ static const struct dw_pcie_host_ops dw_plat_pcie_host_ops = { >>> .host_init = dw_plat_pcie_host_init, >>> }; >>> >>> -static int dw_plat_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp, >>> +static int dw_plat_pcie_establish_link(struct dw_pcie *pci) >>> +{ >>> + dw_pcie_ep_linkup(&pci->ep); >> >> .start_link ops is used incorrectly here. .start_link is used when all the >> endpoint side configuration is done and "is ready" to establish a link with the >> host. But dw_pcie_ep_linkup is used to inform the function devices that the >> link "has been" established. > > If I move the dw_pcie_ep_linkup call from the dw_plat_pcie_establish_link to the > dw_plat_pcie_ep_init function it would be more correct in your perspective? If > not, where you suggest? No, dw_pcie_ep_linkup is an optional function. If your platform gives a notification when the link to the host is established, then you have to invoke this function. If you keep "linkup_notifier = false" in pci-epf-test.c, dw_pcie_ep_linkup should be required. > >>> + >>> + return 0; >>> +} >>> + >>> +static void dw_plat_pcie_stop_link(struct dw_pcie *pci) >>> +{ >>> + >>> +} >> >> Not necessary to have empty function here. pci-epc-core will not try to invoke >> ops which are not populated. > > Ok, I'll remove it. > >>> + >>> +static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = { >>> + .start_link = dw_plat_pcie_establish_link, >>> + .stop_link = dw_plat_pcie_stop_link, >>> +}; >>> + >>> +static void dw_plat_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep) >>> +{ >>> + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep); >>> + enum pci_barno bar; >>> + >>> + for (bar = BAR_0; bar <= BAR_5; bar++) >>> + dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, bar); >>> +} >>> + >>> +static int dw_plat_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no, >>> + enum pci_epc_irq_type type, >>> + u8 interrupt_num) >>> +{ >>> + struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep); >>> + >>> + switch (type) { >>> + case PCI_EPC_IRQ_LEGACY: >>> + dev_err(pci->dev, "EP cannot trigger legacy IRQs\n"); >>> + return -EINVAL; >>> + case PCI_EPC_IRQ_MSI: >>> + return dw_pcie_ep_raise_msi_irq(ep, func_no, interrupt_num); >>> + default: >>> + dev_err(pci->dev, "UNKNOWN IRQ type\n"); >>> + } >>> + >>> + return 0; >>> +} >>> + >>> +static struct dw_pcie_ep_ops pcie_ep_ops = { >>> + .ep_init = dw_plat_pcie_ep_init, >>> + .raise_irq = dw_plat_pcie_ep_raise_irq, >>> +}; >>> + >>> +static int dw_plat_add_pcie_port(struct dw_plat_pcie *dw_plat_pcie, >>> struct platform_device *pdev) >>> { >>> + struct dw_pcie *pci = dw_plat_pcie->pci; >>> + struct pcie_port *pp = &pci->pp; >>> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; >>> int ret; >>> >>> @@ -63,15 +125,44 @@ static int dw_plat_add_pcie_port(struct pcie_port *pp, >>> >>> ret = dw_pcie_host_init(pp); >>> if (ret) { >>> - dev_err(dev, "failed to initialize host\n"); >>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize host\n"); >>> return ret; >>> } >>> >>> return 0; >>> } >>> >>> -static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = { >>> -}; >>> +static int dw_plat_add_pcie_ep(struct dw_plat_pcie *dw_plat_pcie, >>> + struct platform_device *pdev) >>> +{ >>> + int ret; >>> + struct dw_pcie_ep *ep; >>> + struct resource *res; >>> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev; >>> + struct dw_pcie *pci = dw_plat_pcie->pci; >>> + >>> + ep = &pci->ep; >>> + ep->ops = &pcie_ep_ops; >>> + >>> + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "dbi2"); >>> + pci->dbi_base2 = devm_ioremap(dev, res->start, resource_size(res)); >>> + if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base2)) >>> + return PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base2); >>> + >>> + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "addr_space"); >>> + if (!res) >>> + return -EINVAL; >>> + >>> + ep->phys_base = res->start; >>> + ep->addr_size = resource_size(res); >>> + >>> + ret = dw_pcie_ep_init(ep); >>> + if (ret) { >>> + dev_err(dev, "Failed to initialize endpoint\n"); >>> + return ret; >>> + } >>> + return 0; >>> +} >>> >>> static int dw_plat_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> { >>> @@ -80,6 +171,16 @@ static int dw_plat_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> struct dw_pcie *pci; >>> struct resource *res; /* Resource from DT */ >>> int ret; >>> + const struct of_device_id *match; >>> + const struct dw_plat_pcie_of_data *data; >>> + enum dw_pcie_device_mode mode; >>> + >>> + match = of_match_device(dw_plat_pcie_of_match, dev); >>> + if (!match) >>> + return -EINVAL; >>> + >>> + data = (struct dw_plat_pcie_of_data *)match->data; >>> + mode = (enum dw_pcie_device_mode)data->mode; >>> >>> dw_plat_pcie = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*dw_plat_pcie), GFP_KERNEL); >>> if (!dw_plat_pcie) >>> @@ -93,23 +194,59 @@ static int dw_plat_pcie_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) >>> pci->ops = &dw_pcie_ops; >>> >>> dw_plat_pcie->pci = pci; >>> + dw_plat_pcie->mode = mode; >>> + >>> + res = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "dbi"); >>> + if (!res) >>> + res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); >>> >>> - res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0); >>> pci->dbi_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res); >>> if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base)) >>> return PTR_ERR(pci->dbi_base); >>> >>> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, dw_plat_pcie); >>> >>> - ret = dw_plat_add_pcie_port(&pci->pp, pdev); >>> - if (ret < 0) >>> - return ret; >>> + switch (dw_plat_pcie->mode) { >>> + case DW_PCIE_RC_TYPE: >>> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_DW_PLAT_HOST)) >>> + return -ENODEV; >>> + >>> + ret = dw_plat_add_pcie_port(dw_plat_pcie, pdev); >>> + if (ret < 0) >>> + return ret; >>> + break; >>> + case DW_PCIE_EP_TYPE: >>> + if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PCIE_DW_PLAT_EP)) >>> + return -ENODEV; >>> + >>> + ret = dw_plat_add_pcie_ep(dw_plat_pcie, pdev); >>> + if (ret < 0) >>> + return ret; >>> + break; >>> + default: >>> + dev_err(dev, "INVALID device type %d\n", dw_plat_pcie->mode); >>> + } >>> >>> return 0; >>> } >>> >>> +static const struct dw_plat_pcie_of_data dw_plat_pcie_rc_of_data = { >>> + .mode = DW_PCIE_RC_TYPE, >>> +}; >>> + >>> +static const struct dw_plat_pcie_of_data dw_plat_pcie_ep_of_data = { >>> + .mode = DW_PCIE_EP_TYPE, >>> +}; >>> + >>> static const struct of_device_id dw_plat_pcie_of_match[] = { >>> - { .compatible = "snps,dw-pcie", }, >>> + { >>> + .compatible = "snps,dw-pcie", >>> + .data = &dw_plat_pcie_rc_of_data, >>> + }, >>> + { >>> + .compatible = "snps,dw-pcie-ep", >>> + .data = &dw_plat_pcie_ep_of_data, >>> + }, >>> {}, >>> }; >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c >>> index 64d8a17..d7de684 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c >>> +++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c >>> @@ -451,9 +451,14 @@ static int pci_epf_test_bind(struct pci_epf *epf) >>> return 0; >>> } >>> >>> +static const struct pci_epf_test_data pci_epf_data = { >>> + .linkup_notifier = false >>> +}; >>> + >>> static const struct pci_epf_device_id pci_epf_test_ids[] = { >>> { >>> .name = "pci_epf_test", >>> + .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&pci_epf_data, >> >> This will disable linkup_notifier for existing devices. Please add a new entry >> to the table to make any modifications to driver data. (I have a configfs fix >> for this to work. Will post that today). > > Are you refering to this patch? https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10319695/ > Let's see if I understood it right, this patch will expose the some configfs > (something like /sys/kernel/config/pci_ep/functions/pci_epf_test/func1/...) that > ables me to disable the linkup notifier for existing devices without the need to > change the code like I did, right? Actually that patch doesn't add any configfs attribute entry. It just creates a new configfs directory for every entry populated in pci_epf_device_id. For example, If you have something like this static const struct pci_epf_test_data k2g_data = { .test_reg_bar = BAR_1, .linkup_notifier = false }; static const struct pci_epf_device_id pci_epf_test_ids[] = { { .name = "pci_epf_test", }, { .name = "pci_epf_test_k2g", .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&k2g_data, }, {}, }; after [1], there should be 2 entries in /sys/kernel/config/pci_ep/functions/ pci_epf_test and pci_epf_test_k2g. Here if you use pci_epf_test_k2g entry then the driver data associated with pci_epf_test_k2g will be used. Thanks Kishon [1] -> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10319695/ > >> >> Thanks >> Kishon >> > >