On Tue, Nov 17, 2015 at 01:11:56PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >On 11/17/2015 12:38 PM, Gavin Shan wrote: >>On Mon, Nov 16, 2015 at 07:02:03PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: >>>On 11/05/2015 12:12 AM, Gavin Shan wrote: >>>>This enables M64 window on P7IOC, which has been enabled on PHB3. >>>>Different from PHB3 where 16 M64 BARs are supported and each of >>>>them can be owned by one particular PE# exclusively or divided >>>>evenly to 256 segments, every P7IOC PHB has 16 M64 BARs and each >>>>of them are divided to 8 segments. So every P7IOC PHB supports >>>>128 M64 segments in total. P7IOC has M64DT, which helps mapping >>>>one particular M64 segment# to arbitrary PE#. PHB3 doesn't have >>>>M64DT, indicating that one M64 segment can only be pinned to the >>>>fixed PE#. In order to have same code to support M64 on P7IOC and >>>>PHB3, we just provide 128 M64 segments on every P7IOC PHB and each >>>>of them is pinned to the fixed PE# by bypassing the function of >>>>M64DT. In turn, we just need different phb->init_m64() for P7IOC >>>>and PHB3 to support M64. >>>> >>>>Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <gwshan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >>>>--- >>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c | 86 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-- >>>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h | 3 ++ >>>> 2 files changed, 86 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >>>> >>>>diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c >>>>index 1f7d985..bfe69f1 100644 >>>>--- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c >>>>+++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci-ioda.c >>>>@@ -256,6 +256,64 @@ static void pnv_ioda_reserve_dev_m64_pe(struct pci_dev *pdev, >>>> } >>>> } >>>> >>>>+static int pnv_ioda1_init_m64(struct pnv_phb *phb) >>>>+{ >>>>+ struct resource *r; >>>>+ int index; >>>>+ >>>>+ /* >>>>+ * There are 16 M64 BARs, each of which has 8 segments. So >>>>+ * there are as many M64 segments as the maximum number of >>>>+ * PEs, which is 128. >>>>+ */ >>>>+ for (index = 0; index < PNV_IODA1_M64_NUM; index++) { >>>>+ unsigned long base, segsz = phb->ioda.m64_segsize; >>>>+ int64_t rc; >>>>+ >>>>+ base = phb->ioda.m64_base + >>>>+ index * PNV_IODA1_M64_SEGS * segsz; >>>>+ rc = opal_pci_set_phb_mem_window(phb->opal_id, >>>>+ OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, index, base, 0, >>>>+ PNV_IODA1_M64_SEGS * segsz); >>>>+ if (rc != OPAL_SUCCESS) { >>>>+ pr_warn(" Error %lld setting M64 PHB#%d-BAR#%d\n", >>>>+ rc, phb->hose->global_number, index); >>>>+ goto fail; >>>>+ } >>>>+ >>>>+ rc = opal_pci_phb_mmio_enable(phb->opal_id, >>>>+ OPAL_M64_WINDOW_TYPE, index, >>>>+ OPAL_ENABLE_M64_SPLIT); >>>>+ if (rc != OPAL_SUCCESS) { >>>>+ pr_warn(" Error %lld enabling M64 PHB#%d-BAR#%d\n", >>>>+ rc, phb->hose->global_number, index); >>>>+ goto fail; >>>>+ } >>>>+ } >>>>+ >>>>+ /* >>>>+ * Exclude the segment used by the reserved PE, which >>>>+ * is expected to be 0 or last supported PE#. >>>>+ */ >>>>+ r = &phb->hose->mem_resources[1]; >>> >>> >>>What does "1" mean here? A bridge's 64bit prefetchable window? >>> >> >>It's PHB's M64 window. > >mem_resources[] of a hose are not windows of the root PCI bridge? > No. They're windows for root bus, but not for root PCI bridge. >> >>> >>>>+ if (phb->ioda.reserved_pe_idx == 0) >>>>+ r->start += phb->ioda.m64_segsize; >>>>+ else if (phb->ioda.reserved_pe_idx == (phb->ioda.total_pe_num - 1)) >>>>+ r->end -= phb->ioda.m64_segsize; >>>>+ else >>>>+ pr_warn(" Cannot cut M64 segment for reserved PE#%d\n", >>>>+ phb->ioda.reserved_pe_idx); >>>>+ >> Thanks, Gavin -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html