Re: [Query/Discussion]: IO translation with designware PCIe controller

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Monday 09 December 2013, Pratyush Anand wrote:
> > I think it does handle this correctly, look at
> > 
> > static int dw_pcie_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
> > {
> > 	...
> >         if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->config.io_size > 0) {
> >                 sys->io_offset = global_io_offset - pp->config.io_bus_addr;
> >                 pci_ioremap_io(sys->io_offset, pp->io.start);
> >                 global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
> >                 pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->io,
> >                                         sys->io_offset);
> >         }
> > 	...
> > }
> > 
> > I believe this does the right thing, but you have to put the correct
> > translation into the 'ranges' property of the host bridge node in DT.
> 
> May be not exactly. pp->io is the  realio, and it is passed correctly
> to pci_add_resource_offset. But, as you had also
> said that pci_ioremap_io will receive cpu physical address space as
> input, therefore I think following modification will be needed to work
> io transaction properly.

I see. I think you are right.

> diff --git a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> index be6ce30..cf68632 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/host/pcie-designware.c
> @@ -378,6 +378,7 @@ int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>  					   + global_io_offset);
>  			pp->config.io_size = resource_size(&pp->io);
>  			pp->config.io_bus_addr = range.pci_addr;
> +			pp->io_base = range.cpu_addr;
>  		}
>  		if (restype == IORESOURCE_MEM) {
>  			of_pci_range_to_resource(&range, np, &pp->mem);
> @@ -403,7 +404,6 @@ int __init dw_pcie_host_init(struct pcie_port *pp)
>  
>  	pp->cfg0_base = pp->cfg.start;
>  	pp->cfg1_base = pp->cfg.start + pp->config.cfg0_size;
> -	pp->io_base = pp->io.start;
>  	pp->mem_base = pp->mem.start;
>  
>  	pp->va_cfg0_base = devm_ioremap(pp->dev, pp->cfg0_base,

This looks correct to me and it seems to also fix a bug in
dw_pcie_prog_viewport_io_outbound if I read this correctly.

> @@ -667,7 +667,7 @@ static int dw_pcie_setup(int nr, struct pci_sys_data *sys)
>  
>  	if (global_io_offset < SZ_1M && pp->config.io_size > 0) {
>  		sys->io_offset = global_io_offset - pp->config.io_bus_addr;
> -		pci_ioremap_io(sys->io_offset, pp->io.start);
> +		pci_ioremap_io(sys->io_offset, pp->io_base);
>  		global_io_offset += SZ_64K;
>  		pci_add_resource_offset(&sys->resources, &pp->io,
>  					sys->io_offset);

I think there is still a related bug in here: we should pass global_io_offset rather
than sys->io_offset to pci_ioremap_io, so we map the new window into the first
available spot in the Linux view of the I/O space, rather than passing a number
that might be zero for any bus, if the 'ranges' are set up to have an identity
mapping between Linux I/O spaces and PCI I/O spaces. You should be able to verify
this by setting the I/O range for the bus to a random 4KB multiple in DT and
observe that Linux start allocating ports from 0x1000 but the raw BAR values
would contain the value you have chosen.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux