Re: [PATCH 07/12] e1000e: Use standard #defines for PCIe Capability ASPM fields

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:24 PM, Jeff Kirsher
<jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 15:07 -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Jeff Kirsher
>> <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 13:57 -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>> >> Use the standard #defines for PCIe Capability ASPM fields.
>> >>
>> >> Previously we used PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S and PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1
>> >> directly, but
>> >> these are defined for the Linux ASPM interfaces, e.g.,
>> >> pci_disable_link_state(), and only coincidentally match the actual
>> >> register
>> >> bits.  PCIE_LINK_STATE_CLKPM, also part of that interface, does not
>> >> match
>> >> the register bit.
>> >>
>> >> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> >> CC: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> CC: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> CC: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> CC: Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> CC: Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> CC: Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> CC: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> CC: Alex Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> CC: John Ronciak <john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx>
>> >> CC: e1000-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> >> ---
>> >>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c |   11 +++++++++--
>> >>  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > Thanks I will add this patch to my queue for e1000e.  Since this is
>> > patch 7 of 12, are there PCI dependent patches in the series that need
>> > to be applied before?
>>
>> Yes.  It does depend on a previous patch that adds the #defines to
>> include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
>> (http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=135474107109010&w=2).
>>
>> I plan to merge that during the v3.8 merge window, so you can merge it
>> after that.  Or, if it won't cause you conflicts, I can include the
>> e1000e change in my PCI tree.
>>
>> Bjorn
>
> yeah, it does not apply cleanly (because of patches currently in the
> queue from Bruce).  So I will take care of pushing your e1000e patch
> through Dave's tree.

The pci_regs.h change this depends on appeared in v3.8-rc2, so this
patch can be merged any time, at least as far as that particular
issue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux