On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 13:57 -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > Use the standard #defines for PCIe Capability ASPM fields. > > Previously we used PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S and PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1 > directly, but > these are defined for the Linux ASPM interfaces, e.g., > pci_disable_link_state(), and only coincidentally match the actual > register > bits. PCIE_LINK_STATE_CLKPM, also part of that interface, does not > match > the register bit. > > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx> > CC: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx> > CC: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx> > CC: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@xxxxxxxxx> > CC: Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@xxxxxxxxx> > CC: Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@xxxxxxxxx> > CC: Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@xxxxxxxxx> > CC: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@xxxxxxxxx> > CC: Alex Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@xxxxxxxxx> > CC: John Ronciak <john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx> > CC: e1000-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > --- > drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c | 11 +++++++++-- > 1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) Thanks I will add this patch to my queue for e1000e. Since this is patch 7 of 12, are there PCI dependent patches in the series that need to be applied before?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
