Re: [PATCH 07/12] e1000e: Use standard #defines for PCIe Capability ASPM fields

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 15:07 -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 5, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Jeff Kirsher
> <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-12-05 at 13:57 -0700, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> >> Use the standard #defines for PCIe Capability ASPM fields.
> >>
> >> Previously we used PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S and PCIE_LINK_STATE_L1
> >> directly, but
> >> these are defined for the Linux ASPM interfaces, e.g.,
> >> pci_disable_link_state(), and only coincidentally match the actual
> >> register
> >> bits.  PCIE_LINK_STATE_CLKPM, also part of that interface, does not
> >> match
> >> the register bit.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Bruce Allan <bruce.w.allan@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Carolyn Wyborny <carolyn.wyborny@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Don Skidmore <donald.c.skidmore@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Greg Rose <gregory.v.rose@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Peter P Waskiewicz Jr <peter.p.waskiewicz.jr@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: Alex Duyck <alexander.h.duyck@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: John Ronciak <john.ronciak@xxxxxxxxx>
> >> CC: e1000-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> ---
> >>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/e1000e/netdev.c |   11 +++++++++--
> >>  1 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > Thanks I will add this patch to my queue for e1000e.  Since this is
> > patch 7 of 12, are there PCI dependent patches in the series that need
> > to be applied before?
> 
> Yes.  It does depend on a previous patch that adds the #defines to
> include/uapi/linux/pci_regs.h
> (http://marc.info/?l=linux-pci&m=135474107109010&w=2).
> 
> I plan to merge that during the v3.8 merge window, so you can merge it
> after that.  Or, if it won't cause you conflicts, I can include the
> e1000e change in my PCI tree.
> 
> Bjorn

yeah, it does not apply cleanly (because of patches currently in the
queue from Bruce).  So I will take care of pushing your e1000e patch
through Dave's tree.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux