> -----Original Message-----
> From: Krzysztof Wilczy?ski <kw@xxxxxxxxx>
> Sent: 2024年11月7日 15:20
> To: Hongxing Zhu <hongxing.zhu@xxxxxxx>
> Cc: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@xxxxxxxxxx>; bhelgaas@xxxxxxxxxx;
> lorenzo.pieralisi@xxxxxxx; Frank Li <frank.li@xxxxxxx>; mani@xxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-pci@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-arm-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
> linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx; imx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] PCI: dwc: Fix resume failure if no EP is connected at
> some platforms
>
> Hello,
>
> > > But I don't think you responded to the race question. What happens
> here?
> > >
> > > if (dw_pcie_get_ltssm(pci) > DW_PCIE_LTSSM_DETECT_ACT) {
> > > --> link goes down here <--
> > > pci->pp.ops->pme_turn_off(&pci->pp);
> > >
> > > You decide the LTSSM is active and the link is up. Then the link goes
> down.
> > > Then you send PME_Turn_off. Now what?
> > >
> > > If it's safe to try to send PME_Turn_off regardless of whether the
> > > link is up or down, there would be no need to test the LTSSM state.
> > I made a local tests on i.MX95/i.MX8QM/i.MX8MP/i.MX8MM/i.MX8MQ,
> and
> > confirm that it's safe to send PME_TURN_OFF although the link is down.
> > You're right. It's no need to test LTSSM state here.
> > So do the L2 poll listed above after PME_TURN_OFF is sent.
> >
> > Since the 6.13 merge window is almost closed.
> > How about I prepare another Fix patch to do the following items for
> > incoming 6.14?
> > - Before sending PME_TURN_OFF, don't test the LTSSM stat.
> > - Remove the L2 stat poll, after sending PME_TURN_OFF.
>
> If the changes aren't too involved, then I would rather fix it or drop the not
> needed code now, before we sent the Pull Request.
>
> So, feel free to sent a small patch against the current branch, or simply let me
> know how do you wish the current code to be changed, so I can do it against
> the current branch.
Thanks for your kindly reminder.
This clean up small patch is on the way.
Best Regards
Richard Zhu
>
> Thank you!
>
> Krzysztof
