Re: One chart on pci bridge and its bus and their children

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 9:11 PM, Ram Pai <linuxram@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 05, 2012 at 11:26:27AM +0800, Richard Yang wrote:

>> BTW, the pci_bus->self, pci_bus->bridge seem to point the same thing.
>> So this is really necessary to do this?
>
> pci_bus->self points to the pci_dev structure, and pci_bus->bridge
> points to the device structure. Both correspond to the same bridge. BTW: device
> structure is the basic structure to represent any device in the system,
> not necessarily pci device.

That's true, but I don't think it answers the question.  If we have:

    pci_bus->bridge == pci_bus->self->dev

why would we need both "self" and "bridge"?  It would be interesting
to try to remove "bridge" and replace uses of it with "self->dev".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux