On Thu, Jul 4, 2024 at 9:49 AM Stanimir Varbanov <svarbanov@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Hi Jim,
On 7/3/24 21:02, Jim Quinlan wrote:
> In some cases the result of a reset_control_xxx() call have been ignored.
> Now we check all return values of such functions and at the least issue a
> dev_err(...) message if the return value is not zero.
>
When I made the comment for the return value of reset_control_xxx API I
was thinking for propagating the error to upper PCI layer and not just
print it.
Printing the error is a step forward but I don't think it is enough.
Please drop the patch from the series, we can fix that problem in the
driver with follow up patches.
I'll return the value up the chain as you want as there is a list of things anyway for v3.
Regards
Jim Quinlan
Broadcom STB
~Stan
> Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/pci/controller/pcie-brcmstb.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
Attachment:
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
