Re: [LSF/MM/BPF TOPIC] CXL Development Discussions

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Sun, 12 May 2024, Michal Hocko wrote:

+1. I think the performance implications of CXL memory and how it relates
to existing memory management code tackling performance differentiated memory
would be nice to separate. I think Davidlohr would be a great candidate to
lead this discussion.

WDYT Davidlohr?

I think that the relevant performance discussions will happen in the tiering
session from David R.


[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux