On Fri, 13 Apr 2012, 14:26:19 BST, Steven Newbury <steve@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 13/04/12 13:49, Steven Newbury wrote: > > On 13/04/12 12:58, Steven Newbury wrote: > > > > > > It's not stable, crashes soon after GMA comes up. (Could be > > > > unrelated breakage in linus/master? Probably not but I will > > > > verify.) I noticed the high allocations are occuring from the > > > > top of 64-bit address-space, whilst /proc/cpuinfo shows only > > > > 48 bits of virtual addressing. Could that be why..? > > > To reply to myself again, I should have said crashes shortly > > > after Xorg initialises using the intel driver, in both cases! > > > I'm building a kernel now without the patch set to see if it's > > > unrelated. If it still dies I'll try applying your patch set to > > > a branch without the changes from linus/master... (should have > > > done that anyway...) > > > > Okay, I instead created a branch from an older 3.4-rc1+ kernel > > tree, running it now, and it seems to be stable. Something perhaps > > in the newer tree not playing nicely. I'll see if I can bisect it, > > or at least base of rc2 if that works... (I'm a little wary of > > crashing the system too much and losing my btrfs filesystem...) > rc2 is fine as well. Not sure what happened there, I need to be more > careful about keeping a clean tree to work from. I'm pretty sure the crash was a from a drm-next regression. I'll try bisecting it.... -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
