Re: [PATCH V3 6/6] PCI: qcom: Add support for IPQ9574

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 8 May 2023 at 15:21, Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 06:19:38PM +0530, Devi Priya wrote:
> > The IPQ9574 platform has 4 Gen3 PCIe controllers: two single-lane
> > and two dual-lane based on SNPS core 5.70a
> > The Qcom IP rev is 1.27.0 and Synopsys IP rev is 5.80a
> > Added a new compatible 'qcom,pcie-ipq9574' and 'ops_1_27_0'
> > which reuses all the members of 'ops_2_9_0' except for the post_init
> > as the SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE configuration differs between 2_9_0
> > and 1_27_0.
> > Also, modified get_resources of 'ops 2_9_0' to get the clocks
> > from the device tree and modelled the post init sequence as
> > a common function to avoid code redundancy.
> >
> > Co-developed-by: Anusha Rao <quic_anusha@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Anusha Rao <quic_anusha@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Devi Priya <quic_devipriy@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> One comment below. With that fixed,
>
> Reviewed-by: Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@xxxxxxxxxx>
>
> - Mani
>
> > ---
> >  Changes in V3:
> >       - Rebased on top of linux-next/master
> >
> >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++--------
> >  1 file changed, 43 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > index 4ab30892f6ef..3682ecdead1f 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom.c
> > @@ -107,6 +107,7 @@
> >
> >  /* PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE register value */
> >  #define SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SZ                    0x10000000
> > +#define SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SZ_1_27_0             0x08000000
> >
> >  /* PARF_MHI_CLOCK_RESET_CTRL register fields */
> >  #define AHB_CLK_EN                           BIT(0)
> > @@ -202,10 +203,10 @@ struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_7_0 {
> >       struct reset_control *rst;
> >  };
> >
> > -#define QCOM_PCIE_2_9_0_MAX_CLOCKS           5
> >  struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_9_0 {
> > -     struct clk_bulk_data clks[QCOM_PCIE_2_9_0_MAX_CLOCKS];
> > +     struct clk_bulk_data *clks;
> >       struct reset_control *rst;
> > +     int num_clks;
> >  };
> >
> >  union qcom_pcie_resources {
> > @@ -1050,17 +1051,10 @@ static int qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> >       struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_9_0 *res = &pcie->res.v2_9_0;
> >       struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> >       struct device *dev = pci->dev;
> > -     int ret;
> >
> > -     res->clks[0].id = "iface";
> > -     res->clks[1].id = "axi_m";
> > -     res->clks[2].id = "axi_s";
> > -     res->clks[3].id = "axi_bridge";
> > -     res->clks[4].id = "rchng";
> > -
> > -     ret = devm_clk_bulk_get(dev, ARRAY_SIZE(res->clks), res->clks);
> > -     if (ret < 0)
> > -             return ret;
> > +     res->num_clks = devm_clk_bulk_get_all(dev, &res->clks);
> > +     if (res->clks < 0)
> > +             return res->num_clks;
>
> Why not return proper error no?

Instead the question should be, why not the proper condition: it tells
`if (res->clks < 0)', while it should be `if (res->num_clks < 0)'.

>
> >
> >       res->rst = devm_reset_control_array_get_exclusive(dev);
> >       if (IS_ERR(res->rst))
> > @@ -1073,7 +1067,7 @@ static void qcom_pcie_deinit_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> >  {
> >       struct qcom_pcie_resources_2_9_0 *res = &pcie->res.v2_9_0;
> >
> > -     clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(ARRAY_SIZE(res->clks), res->clks);
> > +     clk_bulk_disable_unprepare(res->num_clks, res->clks);
> >  }
> >
> >  static int qcom_pcie_init_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> > @@ -1102,19 +1096,16 @@ static int qcom_pcie_init_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> >
> >       usleep_range(2000, 2500);
> >
> > -     return clk_bulk_prepare_enable(ARRAY_SIZE(res->clks), res->clks);
> > +     return clk_bulk_prepare_enable(res->num_clks, res->clks);
> >  }
> >
> > -static int qcom_pcie_post_init_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> > +static int qcom_pcie_post_init(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> >  {
> >       struct dw_pcie *pci = pcie->pci;
> >       u16 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> >       u32 val;
> >       int i;
> >
> > -     writel(SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SZ,
> > -             pcie->parf + PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE);
> > -
> >       val = readl(pcie->parf + PARF_PHY_CTRL);
> >       val &= ~PHY_TEST_PWR_DOWN;
> >       writel(val, pcie->parf + PARF_PHY_CTRL);
> > @@ -1151,6 +1142,26 @@ static int qcom_pcie_post_init_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> >       return 0;
> >  }
> >
> > +static int qcom_pcie_post_init_1_27_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> > +{
> > +     writel(SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SZ_1_27_0,
> > +            pcie->parf + PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE);
> > +
> > +     qcom_pcie_post_init(pcie);
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int qcom_pcie_post_init_2_9_0(struct qcom_pcie *pcie)
> > +{
> > +     writel(SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SZ,
> > +            pcie->parf + PARF_SLV_ADDR_SPACE_SIZE);
> > +
> > +     qcom_pcie_post_init(pcie);
> > +
> > +     return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static int qcom_pcie_link_up(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> >  {
> >       u16 offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> > @@ -1291,6 +1302,15 @@ static const struct qcom_pcie_ops ops_2_9_0 = {
> >       .ltssm_enable = qcom_pcie_2_3_2_ltssm_enable,
> >  };
> >
> > +/* Qcom IP rev.: 1.27.0  Synopsys IP rev.: 5.80a */
> > +static const struct qcom_pcie_ops ops_1_27_0 = {
> > +     .get_resources = qcom_pcie_get_resources_2_9_0,
> > +     .init = qcom_pcie_init_2_9_0,
> > +     .post_init = qcom_pcie_post_init_1_27_0,
> > +     .deinit = qcom_pcie_deinit_2_9_0,
> > +     .ltssm_enable = qcom_pcie_2_3_2_ltssm_enable,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg cfg_1_0_0 = {
> >       .ops = &ops_1_0_0,
> >  };
> > @@ -1323,6 +1343,10 @@ static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg cfg_2_9_0 = {
> >       .ops = &ops_2_9_0,
> >  };
> >
> > +static const struct qcom_pcie_cfg cfg_1_27_0 = {
> > +     .ops = &ops_1_27_0,
> > +};
> > +
> >  static const struct dw_pcie_ops dw_pcie_ops = {
> >       .link_up = qcom_pcie_link_up,
> >       .start_link = qcom_pcie_start_link,
> > @@ -1607,6 +1631,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id qcom_pcie_match[] = {
> >       { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8064-v2", .data = &cfg_2_1_0 },
> >       { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8074", .data = &cfg_2_3_3 },
> >       { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq8074-gen3", .data = &cfg_2_9_0 },
> > +     { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-ipq9574", .data = &cfg_1_27_0 },
> >       { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-msm8996", .data = &cfg_2_3_2 },
> >       { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-qcs404", .data = &cfg_2_4_0 },
> >       { .compatible = "qcom,pcie-sa8540p", .data = &cfg_1_9_0 },
> > --
> > 2.17.1
> >
>
> --
> மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்



-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry




[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux