Re: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Fix writing wrong value if snps,enable-cdm-check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 12:46:03AM +0000, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> Hi Bjorn, Serge,
> 
> > From: Serge Semin, Sent: Friday, February 17, 2023 5:50 AM
> > 
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 11:58:22AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 06:20:12PM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> > > > The "val" of PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL will be reused on the
> > > > "Set the number of lanes". But, if snps,enable-cdm-check" exists,
> > > > the "val" will be set to PCIE_PL_CHK_REG_CONTROL_STATUS.
> > > > Therefore, unexpected register value is possible to be used
> > > > to PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL register if snps,enable-cdm-check" exists.
> > > > So, read PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL register again to fix the issue.
> > > >
> > > > Fixes: ec7b952f453c ("PCI: dwc: Always enable CDM check if "snps,enable-cdm-check" exists")
> > > > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > ---
> > > >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 1 +
> > > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > > > index 6d5d619ab2e9..3bb9ca14fb9c 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > > > @@ -824,6 +824,7 @@ void dw_pcie_setup(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> > > >  	}
> > > >
> > > >  	/* Set the number of lanes */
> > > > +	val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL);
> > >
> > > Definitely a bug, thanks for the fix and the Fixes: tag.
> > >
> > 
> > > But I would like the whole function better if it could be structured
> > > so we read PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL once and wrote it once.  And the
> > > same for PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL.
> > >
> > 
> > I don't see a good looking solution for what you suggest. We'd need to
> > use additional temporary vars and gotos to implement that.
> > 
> > > Maybe there's a reason PCIE_PL_CHK_REG_CONTROL_STATUS must be written
> > > between the two PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL writes or the two
> > > PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL writes, I dunno.  If so, a comment there
> > > about why that is would be helpful.
> > 
> > There were no sign of dependencies between the CDM-check enabling and
> > the rest of the setting performed in the dw_pcie_setup() function.
> > Originally the CDM-check was placed at the tail of the function:
> > 07f123def73e ("PCI: dwc: Add support to enable CDM register check")
> > with no comments why it was placed there exactly. Moreover I got the
> > Rb-tag for my fix from Vidya Sagar, the original patch author. So he
> > was ok with the suggested solution.
> 
> I think so.
> 
> And, I think the commit 07f123def73e and commit ec7b952f453c are not
> related to PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL. So, PCIE_PL_CHK_REG_CONTROL_STATUS
> handling can be moved everywhere in the function, IIUC. So, I think
> we can have a solution with two patches like below:
> 1) Move PCIE_PL_CHK_REG_CONTROL_STATUS handling before reading
>    PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL (as a bug fix patch).

> 2) Refactor PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL handling to avoid writing
>    the register twice (as a patch for next).

IMO I would leave the procedure as is for now seeing you are going to
move the rcar_gen4_pcie_set_max_link_width() code to the generic part
of the driver in the framework of this patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pci/20230210134917.2909314-7-yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx/
per Rob and my requests.

Thus you'll be able to combine all the bus-width updates into a single
method, like dw_pcie_link_set_max_link_width(). The function will look
as coherent as possible meanwhile the dw_pcie_setup() method body will
turn to be smaller and easier to comprehend. Alas that will imply
updating the PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL and PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL
registers twice.

@Bjorn, are you ok with that?

-Serge(y)

> 
> I made patches for it like below. But, what do you think?
> --------------- for 1) ---------------
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> @@ -806,11 +806,6 @@ void dw_pcie_setup(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>  		dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, val);
>  	}
>  
> -	val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL);
> -	val &= ~PORT_LINK_FAST_LINK_MODE;
> -	val |= PORT_LINK_DLL_LINK_EN;
> -	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL, val);
> -
>  	if (dw_pcie_cap_is(pci, CDM_CHECK)) {
>  		val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PL_CHK_REG_CONTROL_STATUS);
>  		val |= PCIE_PL_CHK_REG_CHK_REG_CONTINUOUS |
> @@ -818,6 +813,11 @@ void dw_pcie_setup(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>  		dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_PL_CHK_REG_CONTROL_STATUS, val);
>  	}
>  
> +	val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL);
> +	val &= ~PORT_LINK_FAST_LINK_MODE;
> +	val |= PORT_LINK_DLL_LINK_EN;
> +	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL, val);
> +
>  	if (!pci->num_lanes) {
>  		dev_dbg(pci->dev, "Using h/w default number of lanes\n");
>  		return;
> ---
> --------------- for 2) ---------------
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> @@ -813,19 +813,13 @@ void dw_pcie_setup(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>  		dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_PL_CHK_REG_CONTROL_STATUS, val);
>  	}
>  
> +	/* Set the number of lanes */
>  	val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL);
>  	val &= ~PORT_LINK_FAST_LINK_MODE;
>  	val |= PORT_LINK_DLL_LINK_EN;
> -	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL, val);
> -
> -	if (!pci->num_lanes) {
> -		dev_dbg(pci->dev, "Using h/w default number of lanes\n");
> -		return;
> -	}
> -
> -	/* Set the number of lanes */
> -	val &= ~PORT_LINK_FAST_LINK_MODE;
> -	val &= ~PORT_LINK_MODE_MASK;
> +	/* Mask LINK_MODE if num_lanes is not zero */
> +	if (pci->num_lanes)
> +		val &= ~PORT_LINK_MODE_MASK;
>  	switch (pci->num_lanes) {
>  	case 1:
>  		val |= PORT_LINK_MODE_1_LANES;
> @@ -840,10 +834,12 @@ void dw_pcie_setup(struct dw_pcie *pci)
>  		val |= PORT_LINK_MODE_8_LANES;
>  		break;
>  	default:
> -		dev_err(pci->dev, "num-lanes %u: invalid value\n", pci->num_lanes);
> -		return;
> +		dev_dbg(pci->dev, "Using h/w default number of lanes\n");
> +		break;
>  	}
>  	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL, val);
> +	if (!pci->num_lanes)
> +		return;
>  
>  	/* Set link width speed control register */
>  	val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL);
> --------------------------------------------
> 
> Best regards,
> Yoshihiro Shimoda
> 
> > -Serge(y)
> > 
> > >
> > > >  	val &= ~PORT_LINK_FAST_LINK_MODE;
> > > >  	val &= ~PORT_LINK_MODE_MASK;
> > > >  	switch (pci->num_lanes) {
> > > > --
> > > > 2.25.1
> > > >
> > >
> 



[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux