RE: [PATCH] PCI: dwc: Fix writing wrong value if snps,enable-cdm-check

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Bjorn, Serge,

> From: Serge Semin, Sent: Friday, February 17, 2023 5:50 AM
> 
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 11:58:22AM -0600, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 06:20:12PM +0900, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> > > The "val" of PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL will be reused on the
> > > "Set the number of lanes". But, if snps,enable-cdm-check" exists,
> > > the "val" will be set to PCIE_PL_CHK_REG_CONTROL_STATUS.
> > > Therefore, unexpected register value is possible to be used
> > > to PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL register if snps,enable-cdm-check" exists.
> > > So, read PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL register again to fix the issue.
> > >
> > > Fixes: ec7b952f453c ("PCI: dwc: Always enable CDM check if "snps,enable-cdm-check" exists")
> > > Signed-off-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > ---
> > >  drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c | 1 +
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > > index 6d5d619ab2e9..3bb9ca14fb9c 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
> > > @@ -824,6 +824,7 @@ void dw_pcie_setup(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> > >  	}
> > >
> > >  	/* Set the number of lanes */
> > > +	val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL);
> >
> > Definitely a bug, thanks for the fix and the Fixes: tag.
> >
> 
> > But I would like the whole function better if it could be structured
> > so we read PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL once and wrote it once.  And the
> > same for PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL.
> >
> 
> I don't see a good looking solution for what you suggest. We'd need to
> use additional temporary vars and gotos to implement that.
> 
> > Maybe there's a reason PCIE_PL_CHK_REG_CONTROL_STATUS must be written
> > between the two PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL writes or the two
> > PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL writes, I dunno.  If so, a comment there
> > about why that is would be helpful.
> 
> There were no sign of dependencies between the CDM-check enabling and
> the rest of the setting performed in the dw_pcie_setup() function.
> Originally the CDM-check was placed at the tail of the function:
> 07f123def73e ("PCI: dwc: Add support to enable CDM register check")
> with no comments why it was placed there exactly. Moreover I got the
> Rb-tag for my fix from Vidya Sagar, the original patch author. So he
> was ok with the suggested solution.

I think so.

And, I think the commit 07f123def73e and commit ec7b952f453c are not
related to PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL. So, PCIE_PL_CHK_REG_CONTROL_STATUS
handling can be moved everywhere in the function, IIUC. So, I think
we can have a solution with two patches like below:
1) Move PCIE_PL_CHK_REG_CONTROL_STATUS handling before reading
   PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL (as a bug fix patch).
2) Refactor PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL handling to avoid writing
   the register twice (as a patch for next).

I made patches for it like below. But, what do you think?
--------------- for 1) ---------------
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
@@ -806,11 +806,6 @@ void dw_pcie_setup(struct dw_pcie *pci)
 		dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL, val);
 	}
 
-	val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL);
-	val &= ~PORT_LINK_FAST_LINK_MODE;
-	val |= PORT_LINK_DLL_LINK_EN;
-	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL, val);
-
 	if (dw_pcie_cap_is(pci, CDM_CHECK)) {
 		val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PL_CHK_REG_CONTROL_STATUS);
 		val |= PCIE_PL_CHK_REG_CHK_REG_CONTINUOUS |
@@ -818,6 +813,11 @@ void dw_pcie_setup(struct dw_pcie *pci)
 		dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_PL_CHK_REG_CONTROL_STATUS, val);
 	}
 
+	val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL);
+	val &= ~PORT_LINK_FAST_LINK_MODE;
+	val |= PORT_LINK_DLL_LINK_EN;
+	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL, val);
+
 	if (!pci->num_lanes) {
 		dev_dbg(pci->dev, "Using h/w default number of lanes\n");
 		return;
---
--------------- for 2) ---------------
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-designware.c
@@ -813,19 +813,13 @@ void dw_pcie_setup(struct dw_pcie *pci)
 		dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_PL_CHK_REG_CONTROL_STATUS, val);
 	}
 
+	/* Set the number of lanes */
 	val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL);
 	val &= ~PORT_LINK_FAST_LINK_MODE;
 	val |= PORT_LINK_DLL_LINK_EN;
-	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL, val);
-
-	if (!pci->num_lanes) {
-		dev_dbg(pci->dev, "Using h/w default number of lanes\n");
-		return;
-	}
-
-	/* Set the number of lanes */
-	val &= ~PORT_LINK_FAST_LINK_MODE;
-	val &= ~PORT_LINK_MODE_MASK;
+	/* Mask LINK_MODE if num_lanes is not zero */
+	if (pci->num_lanes)
+		val &= ~PORT_LINK_MODE_MASK;
 	switch (pci->num_lanes) {
 	case 1:
 		val |= PORT_LINK_MODE_1_LANES;
@@ -840,10 +834,12 @@ void dw_pcie_setup(struct dw_pcie *pci)
 		val |= PORT_LINK_MODE_8_LANES;
 		break;
 	default:
-		dev_err(pci->dev, "num-lanes %u: invalid value\n", pci->num_lanes);
-		return;
+		dev_dbg(pci->dev, "Using h/w default number of lanes\n");
+		break;
 	}
 	dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL, val);
+	if (!pci->num_lanes)
+		return;
 
 	/* Set link width speed control register */
 	val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, PCIE_LINK_WIDTH_SPEED_CONTROL);
--------------------------------------------

Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda

> -Serge(y)
> 
> >
> > >  	val &= ~PORT_LINK_FAST_LINK_MODE;
> > >  	val &= ~PORT_LINK_MODE_MASK;
> > >  	switch (pci->num_lanes) {
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
> >





[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux