On Fri, 24 Jun 2022 16:15:31 +0200 Lukas Wunner <lukas@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 12:08:30PM +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > I've put this in for now: > > Perfect! For me as a non-native English speaker, it would have been > a lot more difficult to write up such an excellent description, > so thanks for doing this. It always feels a bit like cheating when you get to write these things in your first language! > > > Hence this proposal for a BoF rather than session in > > either PCI or CXL uconf. > > I think this has overlap with the Confidential Computing uconf as well, > so that might be another potentially interested audience. > > (Link encryption is by its very nature "confidential computing", > and attestation is explicitly mentioned on the CC uconf page: > https://lpc.events/event/16/contributions/1143/ ) > > Thanks, > > Lukas > Good point. That is an area in which we need dance around what we can an can't say (i.e. what is public from various standards orgs) but they may well still be interested. Added - Confidential compute community to list of people who might be interested. +CC Joerg so he knows this proposal exists and can perhaps drag in anyone else who might be interested. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20220624120830.00002eef@xxxxxxxxxx/ for abstract. Thanks, Jonathan
