On Tue, 1 Nov 2011 07:47:05 -0700 Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think that the PCI "poll for PME" logic should just resume the > device - and *not* suspend it again. Maybe it can suspend it next time > around when it polls, if PME has been cleared. That should be (a) sane > and (b) obviate any need for some random delay in some random driver. > > Jesse? > > That said, Matthew's suggestion sounds like a good idea regardless. Yeah that makes sense. But hopefully we can get away without polling at all if we actually implement PME message interrupt support on the host bridge side. Does anyone with affected hardware want to try that? I think the publicly available docs have enough info to do it... -- Jesse Barnes, Intel Open Source Technology Center
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
