On Tuesday 25 May 2021 17:12:15 Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 09:53:38PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > Hello! > > > > On Thursday 15 April 2021 13:01:19 Alex Williamson wrote: > > > [cc +Pali] > > > > > > On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:02:23 +0200 > > > Ingmar Klein <ingmar_klein@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > First thanks to you both, Alex and Bjorn! > > > > I am in no way an expert on this topic, so I have to fully rely on your > > > > feedback, concerning this issue. > > > > > > > > If you should have any other solution approach, in form of patch-set, I > > > > would be glad to test it out. Just let me know, what you think might > > > > make sense. > > > > I will wait for your further feedback on the issue. In the meantime I > > > > have my current workaround via quirk entry. > > > > > > > > By the way, my layman's question: > > > > Do you think, that the following topic might also apply for the QCA6174? > > > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg106395.html > > > > I have been testing more ath cards and I'm going to send a new version > > of this patch with including more PCI ids. > > Dropping this patch in favor of Pali's new version. Hello Bjorn! Seems that it would take much more time to finish my version of patch. So could you take Ingmar's patch with cc:stable tag for now, which just adds PCI device id into list of problematic devices?
