On Wednesday 21 July 2021 10:54:53 Pali Rohár wrote: > On Tuesday 25 May 2021 17:12:15 Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 15, 2021 at 09:53:38PM +0200, Pali Rohár wrote: > > > Hello! > > > > > > On Thursday 15 April 2021 13:01:19 Alex Williamson wrote: > > > > [cc +Pali] > > > > > > > > On Thu, 15 Apr 2021 20:02:23 +0200 > > > > Ingmar Klein <ingmar_klein@xxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > > First thanks to you both, Alex and Bjorn! > > > > > I am in no way an expert on this topic, so I have to fully rely on your > > > > > feedback, concerning this issue. > > > > > > > > > > If you should have any other solution approach, in form of patch-set, I > > > > > would be glad to test it out. Just let me know, what you think might > > > > > make sense. > > > > > I will wait for your further feedback on the issue. In the meantime I > > > > > have my current workaround via quirk entry. > > > > > > > > > > By the way, my layman's question: > > > > > Do you think, that the following topic might also apply for the QCA6174? > > > > > https://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-pci/msg106395.html > > > > > > I have been testing more ath cards and I'm going to send a new version > > > of this patch with including more PCI ids. > > > > Dropping this patch in favor of Pali's new version. > > Hello Bjorn! Seems that it would take much more time to finish my > version of patch. So could you take Ingmar's patch with cc:stable tag > for now, which just adds PCI device id into list of problematic devices? Ping, gentle reminder...
