Re: [PATCH 7/7] PCI ASPM: support per direction l0s management

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Shaohua Li wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 09:16:27AM +0800, Kenji Kaneshige wrote:
The L0s state can be managed separately for each direction (upstream
direction and downstream direction) of the link. But in the current
implementation, those are mixed up. With this patch, L0s for each
direction are managed separately.

To maintain three states (upstream direction L0s, downstream L0s and
L1), 'aspm_support', 'aspm_enabled', 'aspm_capable', 'aspm_disable'
and 'aspm_default' fields in struct pcie_link_state are changed to
3-bit from 2-bit. The 'latency' field is separated to two 'latency_up'
and 'latency_dw' fields to maintain exit latencies for each direction
of the link. For L0, 'latency_up.l0' and 'latency_dw.l0' are used to
configure upstream direction L0s and downstream direction L0s
respectively. For L1, larger value of 'latency_up.l1' and
'latency_dw.l1' is considered as L1 exit latency.
snip

+
+       /* Setup upstream direction L0s state */
+       if (dwreg.support & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S)
+               link->aspm_support |= ASPM_STATE_L0S_UP;
+       if (dwreg.enabled & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S)
+               link->aspm_enabled |= ASPM_STATE_L0S_UP;
+       link->latency_up.l0s = calc_l0s_latency(upreg.latency_encoding_l0s);
+
+       /* Setup downstream direction L0s state */
+       if (upreg.support & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S)
+               link->aspm_support |= ASPM_STATE_L0S_DW;
+       if (upreg.enabled & PCIE_LINK_STATE_L0S)
+               link->aspm_enabled |= ASPM_STATE_L0S_DW;
+       link->latency_dw.l0s = calc_l0s_latency(dwreg.latency_encoding_l0s);
+
Somebody (from HP, IIRC) said a lot of systems don't implement one direction
L0S right if the other direction doesn't support it. And there is a recent
pcisig draft clarifies that software must not enable L0s in either direction
on a given link unless components on both sides of the link each support L0s.
Let's comfrom to it.

Thank you for the information. I think you are talking about "ASPM
Optionality Draft ECN". I didn't noticed that. I'll check it and update patches if needed.

Thanks,
Kenji Kaneshige



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [DMA Engine]     [Linux Coverity]     [Linux USB]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Greybus]

  Powered by Linux