On Fri, Jun 13, 2008 at 10:02:40PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > Also, i have to say that Matthew Wilcox got quite a bit carried away by > characterising the commit a "lie" - this was not a lie (which needs > intent), but a simple mistake. Otherwise this statement in a commit from > Matthew Wilcox would be a "lie" as well: > > | commit 64ac24e738823161693bf791f87adc802cf529ff > | Author: Matthew Wilcox <matthew@xxxxxx> > | Date: Fri Mar 7 21:55:58 2008 -0500 > | > | Generic semaphore implementation > | > | Semaphores are no longer performance-critical, [...] They weren't at the time I wrote the comment. There was a mid-air collision between that patch and 6478d8800b75253b2a934ddcb734e13ade023ad0 Really, Ingo, you should be less bitter about that. -- Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine "Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such a retrograde step." -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pci" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
