On Tue, Dec 06, 2011 at 08:18:43AM -0800, Grant Grundler wrote: > On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 10:23:17AM -0800, Grant Grundler wrote: > ... > >> I'm going to assume this is NOT a problem since any code that > >> generates anything that tries to look like an INB/OUTB just won't > >> compile on parisc. I think removing the parisc specific definition > >> and using the generic one instead looks fine to me. But I'm not > >> confident enough to offer a formal ACKed-by line. Sorry. :( > >> > >> cheers, > >> grant > > > > How about a Tested-by line? I presume you have the hardware to > > try this out? > > I do have the HW at home to test this...but it's not been powered up > in 6+ months. I have to point dpkg at a new repository and update all > the SW on the machine. If you don't mind waiting another week, I'll > make time to do that later this week (or weekend). > > > You can also get the patches from my tree: > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git linux-next > > or from linux-next. > > That's easy enough - thanks! > grant Waiting for 3.4 window to open anyway, so yes that will be nice. Thanks! -- MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
