On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 3:06 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 10:23:17AM -0800, Grant Grundler wrote: ... >> I'm going to assume this is NOT a problem since any code that >> generates anything that tries to look like an INB/OUTB just won't >> compile on parisc. I think removing the parisc specific definition >> and using the generic one instead looks fine to me. But I'm not >> confident enough to offer a formal ACKed-by line. Sorry. :( >> >> cheers, >> grant > > How about a Tested-by line? I presume you have the hardware to > try this out? I do have the HW at home to test this...but it's not been powered up in 6+ months. I have to point dpkg at a new repository and update all the SW on the machine. If you don't mind waiting another week, I'll make time to do that later this week (or weekend). > You can also get the patches from my tree: > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mst/vhost.git linux-next > or from linux-next. That's easy enough - thanks! grant > > -- > MST -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
