On Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:26:29 +0100 (CET) Geert Uytterhoeven <Geert.Uytterhoeven@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks Paul, I wasn't aware of that thread! > > Yes, this is almost the same. The only part I don't agree with is the move of > the creation of the platform device from arch-specific code to rtc-firmware.c, > as this makes autoloading the driver more difficult. and it's also against a proper implementation of the device/driver model. > Seems like everybody but the RTC maintainer has an interest in having an RTC > class driver on top of [gs]et_rtc_time()... ;-) That's because everyone is lazy :) Seriously, if you want to handle it in the way we wrote in the previous emails, it's ok for me. -- Best regards, Alessandro Zummo, Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy http://www.towertech.it -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-parisc" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
